Difference between revisions of "Waltharius142"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|nowrap | [[Causam]] [[conspicitis]]. [[sed]] [[quod]] [[mea]] [[segnia]] [[mentis]] | |nowrap | [[Causam]] [[conspicitis]]. [[sed]] [[quod]] [[mea]] [[segnia]] [[mentis]] | ||
| | | | ||
| − | |{{Commentary|''Causam'': here, as often in the ''Waltharius'', this word is practically the equivalent of ''res'' | + | |{{Commentary|''Causam'': here, as often in the ''Waltharius'', this word is practically the equivalent of ''res''—well on its way to becoming French ''chose'', Italian/Spanish ''cosa'', “thing.” Du Cange’s ''Glossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis'' cites this meaning of ''causa'' in the laws of the Lombards and in the laws of Charlemagne.<br />''Mea segnia'': i.e., Waltharius’s delay in making a decision regarding marriage. |
}} | }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
|nowrap | [[Nil]] [[tam]] [[dulce]] [[mihi]], [[quam]] [[semper]] [[inesse]] [[fideli]] | |nowrap | [[Nil]] [[tam]] [[dulce]] [[mihi]], [[quam]] [[semper]] [[inesse]] [[fideli]] | ||
| | | | ||
| − | |{{Commentary|In the Germanic warrior ethos, love for the lord is to be put above all else. Since Waltharius will soon plot against Attila, the line has a strong note of irony. One could read the loss of Walther’s hand at the end of the poem as punishment for his breach of fealty to Attila, just as Hagan is punished with the loss of his eye for his breach of loyalty to Waltharius. | + | |{{Commentary|(Lines 158–59) In the Germanic warrior ethos, love for the lord is to be put above all else. Since Waltharius will soon plot against Attila, the line has a strong note of irony. One could read the loss of Walther’s hand at the end of the poem as punishment for his breach of fealty to Attila, just as Hagan is punished with the loss of his eye for his breach of loyalty to Waltharius. |
}} | }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
|nowrap | [[Obsequio]] [[domini]]; [[quare]] [[precor]] [[absque]] [[iugali]] | |nowrap | [[Obsequio]] [[domini]]; [[quare]] [[precor]] [[absque]] [[iugali]] | ||
| | | | ||
| − | |{{Commentary|The language here echoes ''Aeneid'' 4.16 ( | + | |{{Commentary|(Lines 159–160) The language here echoes ''Aeneid'' 4.16 (see parallels). Dido uses these words when talking to her sister Anna about how she might be susceptible to Aeneas, if only she had not decided to avoid ''vinclo … iugali'' “nuptial bounds.” Dido goes on to fall for Aeneas, just as Waltharius, despite what he says, will go on to marry Hildegund. The other parallel, which will return later in the poem, is between Attila and Dido, both left behind by the heroes of their respective poems. |
}} | }} | ||
| − | |{{Parallel|2 Kings 5.2 Vulg.: ''Quae erat in obsequio uxoris Naaman.'' “She waited upon Naaman’s wife.”<br />''Aeneid'' 4.16: ''ne cui me vinclo vellem sociare iugali…'' “To ally myself with none in bond of wedlock…” | + | |{{Parallel|(Lines 159–160) 2 Kings 5.2 Vulg.: ''Quae erat in obsequio uxoris Naaman.'' “She waited upon Naaman’s wife.”<br />''Aeneid'' 4.16: ''ne cui me vinclo vellem sociare iugali…'' “To ally myself with none in bond of wedlock…” |
}} | }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
|nowrap | [[Atque]] [[per]] [[invictam]] [[nunc]] [[gentem]] [[Pannoniarum]] | |nowrap | [[Atque]] [[per]] [[invictam]] [[nunc]] [[gentem]] [[Pannoniarum]] | ||
| | | | ||
| − | |{{Commentary|''Nunc'': an ironic touch | + | |{{Commentary|''Nunc'': an ironic touch (cf. line 144)? |
}} | }} | ||
|- | |- | ||